| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Антон Власов <druidvav(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #16036: Segmentation fault while doing an update |
| Date: | 2019-10-04 21:43:00 |
| Message-ID: | 20191004214300.pqe7fruaemklz5qn@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Hi,
Thanks again for the bug report! I've pushed the fix, and tests. They'll
be included in 12.1 (which I assume will happen relatively soon), or you
can compile a slightly newer version yourself.
Regards,
Andres
On 2019-10-04 12:28:48 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2019-10-03 21:30:21 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> > Here's 1, 2 & 4, working on fixing 3). While we now have OK-ish
> > coverage for nodeModifyTable.c and nodeLockRows.c triggered EPQ, there's
> > not much for the trigger case.
> Here's both the fix and tests.
>
> I think the test adds a good bit coverage. What's lacking is primarily
> testing foreign table related paths, but that seems separate enough, and
> would need to be done in a separate contrib/ test anyway.
>
> I think there's a good case to be made to backpatch the tests further
> than 12, but I'm not sure about it? They do pass (with one error message
> about a failure to delete changed to a failure to update, we didn't use
> to be able to discern) back to 9.6, requiring
I did push the tests back to 9.6.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2019-10-04 22:24:37 | Re: BUG #16036: Segmentation fault while doing an update |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2019-10-04 20:49:29 | Re: BUG #16039: PANIC when activating replication slots in Postgres 12.0 64bit under Windows |