Re: Add comments for a postgres program in bootstrap mode

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Youki Shiraishi <shiraishi(at)computer(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Add comments for a postgres program in bootstrap mode
Date: 2019-09-27 04:03:12
Message-ID: 20190927040312.GD8485@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 12:29:08PM +0900, Youki Shiraishi wrote:
> I also vote to get rid of such ambiguous stuff.
> As you can see by grepping, "bootstrap-mode backend" (and something
> like that) is also called in the sources as:
>
> - bootstrap backend
> - (basic) bootstrap process
> - backend running in bootstrap mode
> - postgres (backend) program in bootstrap mode
> - bootstrapper
>
> I think "bootstrap backend" is a strong candidate for an alternative
> of "bootstrapper" because it is used in the official documentation of
> initdb.

It seems to me that "backend running in bootstrap mode" would be the
most consistent way to define that state in a backend process:
$ git grep -i "bootstrap mode backend" | wc -l
0
$ git grep -i "bootstrap-mode" | wc -l
0
$ git grep -i "bootstrap mode" | wc -l
68
$ git grep -i "bootstrap process" | wc -l
9

"bootstrapper" sounds weird. My 2c.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2019-09-27 04:12:24 Re: Add comments for a postgres program in bootstrap mode
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2019-09-27 03:55:50 Re: tab complete for explain SETTINGS