| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Yuli Khodorkovskiy <yuli(dot)khodorkovskiy(at)crunchydata(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)heterodb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Joshua Brindle <joshua(dot)brindle(at)crunchydata(dot)com>, Mike P <mike(dot)palmiotto(at)crunchydata(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: add a MAC check for TRUNCATE |
| Date: | 2019-09-25 21:49:15 |
| Message-ID: | 20190925214915.GA29665@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2019-Sep-25, Yuli Khodorkovskiy wrote:
> Hi Alvaro,
>
> I have attached the updated patches which should rebase.
Great, thanks.
> Since all existing DAC checks should have MAC, should these patches be
> considered a bug fix and therefore back patched?
I don't know the answer to that. My impression from earlier discussion
is that this was seen as a non-backpatchable change, but I defer to Joe
on that as committer. If it were up to me, the ultimate question would
be: would such a change adversely affect existing running systems?
Thanks,
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2019-09-25 21:57:46 | Re: add a MAC check for TRUNCATE |
| Previous Message | Yuli Khodorkovskiy | 2019-09-25 21:40:35 | Re: add a MAC check for TRUNCATE |