Re: NOT IN subquery optimization

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Li, Zheng" <zhelli(at)amazon(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jim Finnerty <jfinnert(at)amazon(dot)com>
Subject: Re: NOT IN subquery optimization
Date: 2019-09-25 20:36:02
Message-ID: 20190925203602.GA24893@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2019-Aug-02, Thomas Munro wrote:

> Hi Zheng, Jim,
>
> With my Commitfest doozer hat on, I have moved this entry to the
> September 'fest. I noticed in passing that it needs to be adjusted
> for the new pg_list.h API. It'd be good to get some feedback from
> reviewers on these two competing proposals:
>
> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/24/2020/
> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/24/2023/

Hello,

Is this patch dead?

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2019-09-25 20:38:34 Re: Optimize partial TOAST decompression
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2019-09-25 20:31:28 Re: [PATCH] ltree, lquery, and ltxtquery binary protocol support