| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Add "password_protocol" connection parameter to libpq |
| Date: | 2019-09-24 02:07:16 |
| Message-ID: | 20190924020716.GD2012@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Sep 21, 2019 at 11:24:30AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> And both make sense.
>
> + * Return true if channel binding was employed and the scram exchange
> upper('scram')?
>
> Except for this nit, it looks good to me.
For the archive's sake: this has been committed as of d6e612f.
- * We pretend that the connection is OK for the duration of these
- * queries.
+ * We pretend that the connection is OK for the duration of
+ * these queries.
The result had some noise diffs. Perhaps some leftover from the
indentation run? That's no big deal anyway.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2019-09-24 02:14:42 | Re: Fix example in partitioning documentation |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2019-09-24 02:02:13 | Re: [PATCH] Sort policies and triggers by table name in pg_dump. |