Re: Optimization of some jsonb functions

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Joe Nelson <joe(at)begriffs(dot)com>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Nikita Glukhov <n(dot)gluhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Optimization of some jsonb functions
Date: 2019-09-19 03:47:15
Message-ID: 20190919034715.GA6743@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2019-Sep-19, Alvaro Herrera wrote:

> On 2019-Sep-18, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Well, I think that was useless, so I rebased again -- attached.
> ... which is how you find out that 0001 as an independent patch is not
> really a valid one, since it depends on an API change that does not
> happen until 0005.

... and there were other compilation problems too, presumably fixed
silently by Joe in his rebase, but which I fixed again for this series
which now seems more credible. I tested compile and regression tests
after each patch, it all works locally.

Álvaro Herrera
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Attachment Content-Type Size
v4-0001-Optimize-jsonb-operator-using-extracted-JsonbValu.patch text/x-diff 6.9 KB
v4-0002-Extract-findJsonbKeyInObject.patch text/x-diff 11.0 KB
v4-0003-Optimize-resulting-JsonbValue-allocation-in-findJ.patch text/x-diff 10.9 KB

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2019-09-19 04:22:19 Re: Feature request: binary NOTIFY
Previous Message Mitar 2019-09-19 03:46:25 Re: Feature request: binary NOTIFY