Re: Optimization of some jsonb functions

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Joe Nelson <joe(at)begriffs(dot)com>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Nikita Glukhov <n(dot)gluhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Optimization of some jsonb functions
Date: 2019-09-19 03:09:06
Message-ID: 20190919030906.GA7043@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2019-Sep-18, Alvaro Herrera wrote:

> Well, I think that was useless, so I rebased again -- attached.

... which is how you find out that 0001 as an independent patch is not
really a valid one, since it depends on an API change that does not
happen until 0005.

Álvaro Herrera
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mitar 2019-09-19 03:46:25 Re: Feature request: binary NOTIFY
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2019-09-19 02:52:04 Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] pageinspect function to decode infomasks