Re: base backup client as auxiliary backend process

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: base backup client as auxiliary backend process
Date: 2019-09-11 22:15:24
Message-ID: 20190911221524.GA16563@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2019-Aug-30, Peter Eisentraut wrote:

> Attached is an updated patch for this. I have changed the initdb option
> name per suggestion. The WAL receiver is now started concurrently with
> the base backup. There is progress reporting (ps display), fsyncing.
> Configuration files are not copied anymore. There is a simple test
> suite. Tablespace support is still missing, but it would be
> straightforward.

This is an amazing feature. How come we don't have people cramming to
review this?

Álvaro Herrera
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2019-09-11 23:10:20 Re: amcheck verification for GiST
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2019-09-11 22:10:28 Re: Run-time pruning for ModifyTable