| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tatsuro Yamada <tatsuro(dot)yamada(dot)tf(at)nttcom(dot)co(dot)jp>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Rafia Sabih <rafia(dot)pghackers(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] CLUSTER command progress monitor |
| Date: | 2019-09-06 05:52:39 |
| Message-ID: | 20190906055239.GE1608@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Sep 06, 2019 at 02:44:18PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> I don't see exactly why we could not switch to a fixed number of
> slots, say 8, with one code path to start a progress which adds an
> extra report on the stack, one to remove one entry from the stack, and
> a new one to reset the whole thing for a backend. This would not need
> much restructuration of course.
Wake up, Neo. Your last sentence is confusing. I meant that this
would need more design efforts, so that's not in scope for v12.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Langote | 2019-09-06 05:59:25 | Re: CVE-2017-7484-induced bugs, or, btree cmp functions are not leakproof? |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2019-09-06 05:48:41 | Re: [bug fix] Produce a crash dump before main() on Windows |