Re: [HACKERS] CLUSTER command progress monitor

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tatsuro Yamada <tatsuro(dot)yamada(dot)tf(at)nttcom(dot)co(dot)jp>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rafia Sabih <rafia(dot)pghackers(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] CLUSTER command progress monitor
Date: 2019-09-04 06:48:19
Message-ID: 20190904064819.GE2170@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 02:52:28PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Indeed, good catch. This is wrong since b6fb647 which has introduced
> the progress reports. I'll fix that one and back-patch if there are
> no objections.

OK, applied this part down to 9.6.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Richard Guo 2019-09-04 07:30:20 Re: d25ea01275 and partitionwise join
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2019-09-04 06:47:16 Re: [Patch] Mingw: Fix import library extension, build actual static libraries