Re: Tid scan improvements

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Edmund Horner <ejrh00(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Tid scan improvements
Date: 2019-09-03 22:34:34
Message-ID: 20190903223434.GA14258@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2019-Aug-01, Edmund Horner wrote:

> Hi everyone,
> Sadly it is the end of the CF and I have not had much time to work on
> this. I'll probably get some time in the next month to look at the
> heapam changes.
> Should we move to CF? We have been in the CF cycle for almost a year now...

Hello, do we have an update on this patch? Last version that was posted
was v9 from David on July 17th; you said you had made some changes on
July 22nd but didn't attach any patch. v9 doesn't apply anymore.


Álvaro Herrera
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2019-09-03 22:36:37 Re: [HACKERS] Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers, take 2
Previous Message Tom Lane 2019-09-03 22:30:32 Re: Patch: New GUC prepared_statement_limit to limit memory used by prepared statements