Re: Minimal logical decoding on standbys

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, tushar <tushar(dot)ahuja(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Shaun Thomas <shaun(dot)thomas(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Minimal logical decoding on standbys
Date: 2019-09-03 17:40:14
Message-ID: 20190903174014.GA18683@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2019-Jul-19, Amit Khandekar wrote:

> Attached are the split patches. Included is an additional patch that
> has doc changes. Here is what I have added in the docs. Pasting it
> here so that all can easily spot how it is supposed to behave, and to
> confirm that we are all on the same page :

... Apparently, this patch was not added to the commitfest for some
reason; and another patch that *is* in the commitfest has been said to
depend on this one (Petr's
which hasn't been updated in quite a while and has received no feedback
at all, not even from the listed reviewer Shaun Thomas). To make
matters worse, Amit's patchset no longer applies.

What I would like to do is add a link to this thread to CF's 1961 entry
and then update all these patches, in order to get things moving.

Álvaro Herrera
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Steele 2019-09-03 18:09:18 Re: SIGQUIT on archiver child processes maybe not such a hot idea?
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2019-09-03 17:31:27 Re: How to estimate the shared memory size required for parallel scan?