| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
| Cc: | Nikita Glukhov <n(dot)gluhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Anastasia Lubennikova <lubennikovaav(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] kNN for btree |
| Date: | 2019-09-02 23:19:48 |
| Message-ID: | 20190902231948.GA5343@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2019-Sep-03, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> I think patches 0001-0008 are very clear and extends our index-AM
> infrastructure in query straightforward way. I'm going to propose
> them for commit after some further polishing.
Hmm. Why is 0001 needed? I see that 0005 introduces a call to that
function, but if attnum == 0 then it doesn't call it. Maybe it was
necessary in an older version of the patch?
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2019-09-02 23:22:05 | Re: pg_upgrade version checking questions |
| Previous Message | Alexander Korotkov | 2019-09-02 23:11:30 | Re: [PATCH] kNN for btree |