| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Cleanup isolation specs from unused steps |
| Date: | 2019-08-23 04:40:12 |
| Message-ID: | 20190823044012.GD5275@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 09:19:47PM -0700, Melanie Plageman wrote:
> It's a connection parameter that allows you to connect to a single Postgres
> node in a Greenplum cluster. I only included it as an example of the kind of
> "Greenplum-specific" things that are in the test framework.
Ah, I see. I had the same stuff for XC to connect to data nodes.
> I've heard Greenplum folks talk about re-writing our "isolation2" framework
> in (probably) C and making it a better fit to contribute. It's definitely on
> my wishlist.
Nice to hear that.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2019-08-23 05:14:03 | Re: when the IndexScan reset to the next ScanKey for in operator |
| Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2019-08-23 04:33:41 | Re: [HACKERS] [WIP] Effective storage of duplicates in B-tree index. |