Re: no default hash partition

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: no default hash partition
Date: 2019-08-07 16:25:02
Message-ID: 20190807162502.GA28350@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2019-Aug-06, Stephen Frost wrote:

> Yeah, that's a fair argument, but giving the user a way to say that
> would address it. As in, "create me a list-partitioned table for these
> values, plus a default." Anyhow, I'm sure that I'm taking this beyond
> what we need to do right now, just sharing where I think it'd be good
> for things to go.

Fabien Coelho already submitted a patch for this IIRC.

Álvaro Herrera
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2019-08-07 16:28:22 Rethinking opclass member checks and dependency strength
Previous Message Konstantin Knizhnik 2019-08-07 16:23:34 Re: Removing unneeded self joins