| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Grouping isolationtester tests in the schedule |
| Date: | 2019-08-07 15:52:41 |
| Message-ID: | 20190807155241.GA2733@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2019-Aug-07, Tom Lane wrote:
> Something related I've been wondering about is whether we could
> parallelize the isolation tests. A difficulty here is that the
> slowest ones tend to also be timing-sensitive, such that running
> them in parallel would increase the risk of failure. But we
> could likely get at least some improvement.
Yeah, there's some improvement to be had there. We've discussed it
previously:
https://postgr.es/m/20180124231006.z7spaz5gkzbdvob5@alvherre.pgsql
I'm not really happy about this grouping if we mean we're restricted in
how we can make tests run in parallel.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2019-08-07 15:59:44 | Re: s/rewinded/rewound/? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2019-08-07 15:49:26 | Re: s/rewinded/rewound/? |