Re: idea: log_statement_sample_rate - bottom limit for sampling

From: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Adrien Nayrat <adrien(dot)nayrat(at)anayrat(dot)info>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: idea: log_statement_sample_rate - bottom limit for sampling
Date: 2019-08-01 10:04:45
Message-ID: 20190801100445.yo5v3pdxelijztzm@development
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 11:47:46AM +0200, Adrien Nayrat wrote:
>Hi,
>
>As we are at the end of this CF and there is still discussions about whether we
>should revert log_statement_sample_limit and log_statement_sample_rate, or try
>to fix it in v12.
>I moved this patch to next commit fest and change status from "ready for
>commiter" to "need review". I hope I didn't make a mistake.
>

Thanks. The RFC status was clearly stale, so thanks for updating. I should
have done that after my review. I think the patch would be moved to the
next CF at the end, but I might be wrong. In any case, I don't think
you've done any mistake.

As for the sampling patch - I think we'll end up reverting the feature for
v12 - it's far too late to rework it at this point. Sorry about that, I
know it's not a warm feeling when you get something done, and then it gets
reverted on the last minute. :-(

regards

--
Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sergei Kornilov 2019-08-01 10:09:51 Re: allow online change primary_conninfo
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2019-08-01 10:03:51 Re: \describe*