| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Rafia Sabih <rafia(dot)pghackers(at)gmail(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Initdb failure |
| Date: | 2019-07-31 01:42:47 |
| Message-ID: | 20190731014247.GI1577@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 03:30:12PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> On the whole though, I don't have a problem with the "do nothing"
> answer. There's no security risk here, and no issue that seems
> likely to arise in actual use cases rather than try-to-break-it
> test scripts.
+1.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2019-07-31 02:20:53 | Re: tap tests driving the database via psql |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2019-07-31 01:40:40 | Re: idea: log_statement_sample_rate - bottom limit for sampling |