Re: Change atoi to strtol in same place

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Joe Nelson <joe(at)begriffs(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Surafel Temesgen <surafel3000(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Change atoi to strtol in same place
Date: 2019-07-24 05:15:21
Message-ID: 20190724051521.xhdp4t26mmcuff5h@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2019-07-24 16:57:42 +1200, David Rowley wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Jul 2019 at 16:02, Joe Nelson <joe(at)begriffs(dot)com> wrote:
> > > In general, I think it's a good idea to fix those places, but I wonder
> > > if we need to change the error messages too.
> >
> > I'll leave that decision for the community to debate. I did, however,
> > remove the newlines for the new error messages being passed to
> > pg_log_error().
>
> I'd like to put my vote not to add this complex code to each option
> validation that requires an integer number. I'm not sure there
> currently is a home for it, but if there was, wouldn't it be better
> writing a function that takes a lower and upper bound and sets some
> output param with the value and returns a bool to indicate if it's
> within range or not?

+many

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2019-07-24 05:16:27 Re: Change atoi to strtol in same place
Previous Message Tom Lane 2019-07-24 05:15:14 Re: stress test for parallel workers