| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pgbench tests vs Windows |
| Date: | 2019-07-24 02:36:16 |
| Message-ID: | 20190724023616.GE14257@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 07:13:51PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>> I propose to prepare a patch along these lines. Alternatively we could
>> just drop it - I don't think the test matters all that hugely.
>
> I'd say try that, but if it doesn't work right away, just skip the
> test on Windows.
+1. I don't see exactly why we should drop it either.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Rowley | 2019-07-24 03:05:37 | Re: Speed up transaction completion faster after many relations are accessed in a transaction |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2019-07-24 02:29:28 | Re: pg_receivewal documentation |