Re: Bad canonicalization for dateranges with 'infinity' bounds

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bad canonicalization for dateranges with 'infinity' bounds
Date: 2019-07-21 18:25:29
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers


* Jeff Davis (pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com) wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-07-18 at 17:36 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > (The commit message doesn't seem to have made it to the pgsql-
> > committers
> > list either, but that's probably an independent issue.)
> I was curious about that as well.

The whitelists we put in place expire after a certain period of time
(iirc, it's 1 year currently) and then your posts end up getting

If you register that address as an alternate for you, you should be
able to post with it without needing to be on a whitelist.



In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2019-07-21 20:01:45 Re: POC: converting Lists into arrays
Previous Message Tom Lane 2019-07-21 16:34:05 Re: Fix typos and inconsistencies for HEAD (take 7)