Re: Bad canonicalization for dateranges with 'infinity' bounds

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bad canonicalization for dateranges with 'infinity' bounds
Date: 2019-07-19 00:19:19
Message-ID: 20190719001919.GA1859@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 05:36:35PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> writes:
> > I went ahead and committed this using Thomas's suggestion to remove the
> > parentheses.
>
> The commit message claims this was back-patched, but I see no back-patch?
>
> (The commit message doesn't seem to have made it to the pgsql-committers
> list either, but that's probably an independent issue.)

REL_12_STABLE has been missed in the set of branches patched. Could
you fix that as well (including the extra fix b0a7e0f0)?
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2019-07-19 00:20:53 Re: Improve search for missing parent downlinks in amcheck
Previous Message Jeff Davis 2019-07-19 00:17:03 Re: Bad canonicalization for dateranges with 'infinity' bounds