Re: Bad canonicalization for dateranges with 'infinity' bounds

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bad canonicalization for dateranges with 'infinity' bounds
Date: 2019-07-18 21:36:35
Message-ID: 16949.1563485795@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> writes:
> I went ahead and committed this using Thomas's suggestion to remove the
> parentheses.

The commit message claims this was back-patched, but I see no back-patch?

(The commit message doesn't seem to have made it to the pgsql-committers
list either, but that's probably an independent issue.)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Laurenz Albe 2019-07-18 22:02:59 Re: Bad canonicalization for dateranges with 'infinity' bounds
Previous Message Jeff Davis 2019-07-18 20:56:16 Re: Bad canonicalization for dateranges with 'infinity' bounds