Re: PG 12 draft release notes

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PG 12 draft release notes
Date: 2019-07-16 06:26:31
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 08:51:34PM +0200, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> I wonder if commits 0ba06e0bf and 40cfe8606 are worth mentioning
> in the release notes. They make "pg_test_fsync" work correctly
> on Windows for the first time.

I don't know about this point specifically. Improving support for
pg_test_fsync on Windows is just a side effect of the first commit
which benefits all frontend tools (the second commit is an
embarrassing bug fix for the first one). And at the same time we
don't really add in the release notes low-level improvements like
these ones.

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ibrar Ahmed 2019-07-16 06:39:10 Re: pgbench - extend initialization phase control
Previous Message Konstantin Knizhnik 2019-07-16 06:19:47 Re: Built-in connection pooler