Re: Introduce MIN/MAX aggregate functions to pg_lsn

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Surafel Temesgen <surafel3000(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Introduce MIN/MAX aggregate functions to pg_lsn
Date: 2019-07-05 03:21:53
Message-ID: 20190705032153.GD26759@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 01:48:24PM -0300, Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 10:57 AM Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> It would be pretty silly to have one and not the other, regardless of
>> whether we can think of an immediate use case.
>
> +1

OK, applied with a catalog version bump. This is cool to have.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2019-07-05 03:24:33 Re: errbacktrace
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2019-07-05 03:07:40 Re: base backup client as auxiliary backend process