Re: [patch]socket_timeout in interfaces/libpq

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: "nagaura(dot)ryohei(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <nagaura(dot)ryohei(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
Cc: "'pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "k(dot)jamison(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com" <k(dot)jamison(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, 'Fabien COELHO' <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, 'Kyotaro HORIGUCHI' <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, "'robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com'" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "MikalaiKeida(at)ibagroup(dot)eu" <MikalaiKeida(at)ibagroup(dot)eu>, "AYahorau(at)ibagroup(dot)eu" <AYahorau(at)ibagroup(dot)eu>, "tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [patch]socket_timeout in interfaces/libpq
Date: 2019-06-26 04:23:08
Message-ID: 20190626042308.GL1714@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 04:13:36AM +0000, nagaura(dot)ryohei(at)fujitsu(dot)com wrote:
> I don't think that the rest one of my proposals has been rejected
> completely, so I want to restart discussion.

I recall on the matter that there was consensus that nobody really
liked this option because it enforced a cancellation on the
connection.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ideriha, Takeshi 2019-06-26 06:23:35 RE: Global shared meta cache
Previous Message nagaura.ryohei@fujitsu.com 2019-06-26 04:14:45 inheritance of connection paramters when using \c