Re: New vacuum option to do only freezing

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: New vacuum option to do only freezing
Date: 2019-06-23 13:29:25
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 03:50:32PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> And I finish with the attached. Thoughts?

So, are there any objections with this patch? Or do people think that
it's too late for v12 and that it is better to wait until v13 opens
for business?

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Justin Pryzby 2019-06-23 14:25:47 Re: make \d show its indices ; and, \d toast show its main table ; and \d relkind=I show its partitions (and tablespace)
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2019-06-23 13:25:35 Refactoring base64 encoding and decoding into a safer interface