Re: Obsolete comments about semaphores in proc.c

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Obsolete comments about semaphores in proc.c
Date: 2019-06-17 13:20:38
Message-ID: 20190617132038.GH18917@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 01:28:42PM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> On 14 Jun 2019, at 01:00, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> Commit 6753333f switched from a semaphore-based waiting to latch-based
>> waiting for ProcSleep()/ProcWakeup(), but left behind some stray
>> references to semaphores. PSA.
>
> LGTM

Fine seen from here as well. I am not spotting other areas, FWIW.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Antonin Houska 2019-06-17 13:25:12 Re: [Proposal] Table-level Transparent Data Encryption (TDE) and Key Management Service (KMS)
Previous Message Paul Guo 2019-06-17 12:53:38 Re: Batch insert in CTAS/MatView code