Re: coverage increase for worker_spi

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: coverage increase for worker_spi
Date: 2019-06-02 04:35:14
Message-ID: 20190602043514.GA622@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2019-Jun-01, Tom Lane wrote:

> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > I ended up with these two patches. I'm not sure about pushing
> > separately. It seems pointless to backport the "fix" to back branches
> > anyway.
>
> Patch passes the eyeball test, though I did not try to run it.
> I concur with squashing into one commit and applying to HEAD only.

Okay, pushed. Let's see how it does, now.

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Binguo Bao 2019-06-02 14:48:34 Optimize partial TOAST decompression
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2019-06-02 03:07:36 Re: coverage additions