Re: Inconsistent error message wording for REINDEX CONCURRENTLY

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Inconsistent error message wording for REINDEX CONCURRENTLY
Date: 2019-05-27 01:54:18
Message-ID: 20190527015418.GD1963@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 11:17:51AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Perhaps something like the attached for the REINDEX portion would make
> the world a better place? What do you think?

Alvaro, do you have extra thoughts about this patch improving the
error message consistency for REINDEX CONCURRENTLY. I quite like the
suggestions you made and this makes the error strings more
project-like, so I would like to apply it.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2019-05-27 02:11:24 Re: [HACKERS] Unlogged tables cleanup
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2019-05-27 01:52:04 Re: Why does pg_checksums -r not have a long option?