Re: PANIC :Call AbortTransaction when transaction id is no normal

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Thunder <thunder1(at)126(dot)com>, Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PANIC :Call AbortTransaction when transaction id is no normal
Date: 2019-05-14 03:50:21
Message-ID: 20190514035021.x5nsxbslr2pnuflo@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2019-05-14 12:37:39 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Still, I would like to understand why the bootstrap process has been
> signaled to begin with, particularly for an initdb, which is not
> really something that should happen on a server where an instance
> runs. If you have a too aggressive monitoring job, you may want to
> revisit that as well, because it is able to complain just with an
> initdb.

Shutdown, timeout, resource exhaustion all seem like possible
causes. Don't think any of them warrant a core file - as the OP
explains, that'll often trigger pages etc.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2019-05-14 04:09:16 Re: VACUUM can finish an interrupted nbtree page split -- is that okay?
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2019-05-14 03:50:09 Re: [HACKERS] Unlogged tables cleanup