Re: [HACKERS] WAL logging problem in 9.4.3?

From: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: 9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com, andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi, robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com, michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] WAL logging problem in 9.4.3?
Date: 2019-05-13 00:37:05
Message-ID: 20190513003705.GA1202614@rfd.leadboat.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Mar 31, 2019 at 03:31:58PM -0700, Noah Misch wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 07:27:08PM -0700, Noah Misch wrote:
> > I also liked the design in the https://postgr.es/m/559FA0BA.3080808@iki.fi
> > last paragraph, and I suspect it would have been no harder to back-patch. I
> > wonder if it would have been simpler and better, but I'm not asking anyone to
> > investigate that.
>
> Now I am asking for that. Would anyone like to try implementing that other
> design, to see how much simpler it would be?

Anyone? I've been deferring review of v10 and v11 in hopes of seeing the
above-described patch first.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2019-05-13 00:43:34 SQL-spec incompatibilities in similar_escape() and related stuff
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2019-05-13 00:17:45 Re: Wrong dead return value in jsonb_utils.c