Re: reindexdb & clusterdb broken against pre-7.3 servers

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, noah(at)leadboat(dot)com
Subject: Re: reindexdb & clusterdb broken against pre-7.3 servers
Date: 2019-05-07 03:18:15
Message-ID: 20190507031815.GG1499@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, May 06, 2019 at 10:23:07PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> The originally-complained-of breakage exists in all active branches,
> so is it really OK to commit this only in HEAD?

I did not think that it would be that critical for back-branches, but
I don't mind going ahead and remove the code there as well. Are there
any objections with it?

Also, wouldn't we want instead to apply on back-branches the first
patch proposed on this thread which fixes the query generation for
this pre-7.3 related code?
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2019-05-07 03:18:28 Re: accounting for memory used for BufFile during hash joins
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2019-05-07 03:15:11 Re: accounting for memory used for BufFile during hash joins