| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: New vacuum option to do only freezing |
| Date: | 2019-05-02 20:16:19 |
| Message-ID: | 20190502201619.GA14051@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Pushed. I added one comment to explain xmin_frozen also, which
otherwise seemed a bit mysterious. I did not backpatch, though, so
9.6-11 are a bit different, but I'm not sure it's a good idea at this
point, though it should be pretty innocuous.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2019-05-02 20:39:15 | Re: Heap lock levels for REINDEX INDEX CONCURRENTLY not quite right? |
| Previous Message | Andreas Joseph Krogh | 2019-05-02 19:41:46 | Re: ERROR: failed to add item to the index page |