Re: doc: improve PG 12 to_timestamp()/to_date() wording

From: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
To: Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: doc: improve PG 12 to_timestamp()/to_date() wording
Date: 2019-05-01 00:14:04
Message-ID: 20190501001403.GN3925@telsasoft.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 09:48:14PM +0300, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> I'd like to add couple of comments from my side.

> > - returns an error because the second template string space is consumed
> > - by the letter <literal>J</literal> in the input string.
> > + returns an error because the second space in the template string consumes
> > + the letter <literal>M</literal> from the input string.
>
> Why <literal>M</literal>? There is no letter "M" is input string.
> The issue here is that we already consumed "J" from "JUN" and trying
> to match "UN" to "MON". So, I think we should live
> <literal>J</literal> here. The rest of this change looks good.

Seems like I confused myself while resolving rebase conflict.

Thanks for checking.

Justin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Melanie Plageman 2019-05-01 00:15:55 Adding a test for speculative insert abort case
Previous Message Andres Freund 2019-04-30 23:50:25 Re: clean up docs for v12