Re: clean up docs for v12

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: clean up docs for v12
Date: 2019-04-27 00:44:20
Message-ID: 20190427004420.GD2032@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 12:17:22PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> But I think the biggest part of the patch is still not even reviewed ?
> I'm referring to ./*review-docs-for-pg12dev.patch

Nope. I looked at the patch, and as mentioned upthread the suggested
changes did not seem like improvements as the existing sentences make
sense, at least to me. Do you have any particular part of your patch
where you think your wording is an improvement? Why do you think so?
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2019-04-27 00:49:36 Re: Identity columns should own only one sequence
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2019-04-27 00:35:19 Re: Fwd: Add tablespace tap test to pg_rewind