Re: Why is it OK for dbsize.c to look at relation files directly?

From: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Why is it OK for dbsize.c to look at relation files directly?
Date: 2019-04-25 21:38:47
Message-ID: 20190425213847.zwq4i3jorl4yxmup@development
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 09:25:03AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 05:18:08PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
>> Just so it's guaranteed that it'll never happen? :)
>
>Items get done, from time to time... b0eaa4c is one rare example :p
>
>/me runs and hides.

IMO this is one of the rare examples of a TODO item that is actually
doable and not "I have no idea how to do this so I'll stick it into the
TODO list". And it seems like a fairly well isolated stuff, so it might
be a nice work for someone new.

regards

--
Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2019-04-25 21:49:09 Re: TRACE_SORT defined by default
Previous Message Tom Lane 2019-04-25 21:12:33 Re: REINDEX INDEX results in a crash for an index of pg_class since 9.6