On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 01:33:39PM +0900, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote:
> I think this is rahter a testing or debugging feature. This can
> be apply to all paths, so the variable might be "path_prefix" or
> something more generic than tablespace_chroot.
>
> Does it make sense?
A GUC which enforces object creation does not sound like a good idea
to me, and what you propose would still bite back, for example two
local nodes could use the same port, but a different Unix socket
path.
--
Michael