Re: pg_dump is broken for partition tablespaces

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_dump is broken for partition tablespaces
Date: 2019-04-22 18:16:28
Message-ID: 20190422181628.GA29329@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2019-Apr-22, Robert Haas wrote:

> PostgreSQL has historically and very deliberately *not made a
> distinction* between "this object is in the default tablespace" and
> "this object is in tablespace X which happens to be the default." I
> think that it's too late to invent such a distinction for reasons of
> backward compatibility -- and if we were going to do it, surely it
> would need to exist for both partitioned tables and the partitions
> themselves. Otherwise it just produces more strange inconsistencies.

Yeah, this is probably right. (I don't think it's the same thing that
Tom was saying, though, or at least I didn't understand his argument
this way.)

I think we can get out of this whole class of problems by forbidding the
TABLESPACE clause for partitioned rels from mentioning the database
tablespace -- that is, users either mention some *other* tablespace, or
partitions follow default_tablespace like everybody else. AFAICS with
that restriction this whole problem does not arise, and the patch may
become simpler. I'll give it a spin.

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2019-04-22 18:17:48 Re: clean up docs for v12
Previous Message Tom Lane 2019-04-22 18:06:52 Re: Do CustomScan as not projection capable node