Re: [PATCH v20] GSSAPI encryption support

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Nico Williams <nico(at)cryptonector(dot)com>, Robbie Harwood <rharwood(at)redhat(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v20] GSSAPI encryption support
Date: 2019-04-12 12:58:55
Message-ID: 20190412125855.GA15472@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 10:22:03AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Another problem is that the two test files cannot be run in parallel
> because they use the same hardcoded data directories. That would have
> to be replaced by temporary directories.

Please note that I have added an open item about the instability of
these tests.

If ones's PG_TEST_EXTRA uses kerberos, just using PROVE_FLAGS="-j4" or
such to run multiple scripts in parallel makes the test failure very
easy to reproduce. That's my case, and I had to disable the test for
now...
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fred .Flintstone 2019-04-12 13:04:34 Re: PostgreSQL pollutes the file system
Previous Message Daniel Gustafsson 2019-04-12 12:56:26 Re: PostgreSQL pollutes the file system