From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Shinoda, Noriyoshi (PN Japan A&PS Delivery)" <noriyoshi(dot)shinoda(at)hpe(dot)com>, Sergei Kornilov <sk(at)zsrv(dot)org>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0 |
Date: | 2019-04-11 03:59:52 |
Message-ID: | 20190411035952.GL2728@paquier.xyz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 03:50:27PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> And here is the patch to address this issue. It happens that a bit
> more than the dependency switch was lacking here:
> - At swap time, we need to have the new index definition track
> relispartition from the old index.
> - Again at swap time, the inheritance link needs to be updated between
> the old/new index and its parent when reindexing a partition index.
Peter, this is an open item, and I think as the committer of the
feature you are its owner. Well, in this case, I don't mind taking
the ownership as need be as I know this stuff. Anyway, could you have
a look at the patch proposed and see if you have any issues with it?
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mark Kirkwood | 2019-04-11 04:01:45 | Re: Zedstore - compressed in-core columnar storage |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2019-04-11 03:55:43 | Re: Qestion about .partial WAL file |