Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: multivariate histograms and MCV lists

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Mark Dilger <hornschnorter(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: multivariate histograms and MCV lists
Date: 2019-04-09 02:29:18
Message-ID: 20190409022918.GD1875@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 09:13:01PM +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> Hmmm, what's the right status in the CF app when a part of a patch was
> committed and the rest should be moved to the next CF? Committed, Moved
> to next CF, or something else?

This stuff has been around for nine commit fests, and you have been
able to finish the basic work. So I think that committed is most
appropriate so as you can start later on with a new concept, new patch
sets, perhaps a new thread, and surely a new CF entry.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2019-04-09 02:51:14 Re: [PATCH v20] GSSAPI encryption support
Previous Message Ashwin Agrawal 2019-04-09 02:26:53 Re: Zedstore - compressed in-core columnar storage