Re: pg_rewind vs superuser

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Michael Banck <mbanck(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_rewind vs superuser
Date: 2019-04-05 10:59:30
Message-ID: 20190405105930.GA1491@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 10:11:22AM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> If that is the case, would running a CHECKPOINT actually cause a problem?

If you exclude the point that it may not be necessary and the
potential extra I/O, no. However we would come back to the point of
pg_rewind requiring a superuser :(
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2019-04-05 11:05:29 Re: pg_rewind vs superuser
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2019-04-05 10:56:44 Re: Speed up transaction completion faster after many relations are accessed in a transaction