From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Cc: | Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: COPY FREEZE and setting PD_ALL_VISIBLE/visibility map bits |
Date: | 2019-04-05 03:06:04 |
Message-ID: | 20190405030604.GA3360@alvherre.pgsql |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2019-Apr-04, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2019-04-04 12:23:08 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> > Also, how is this code even close to correct?
> > CheckAndSetPageAllVisible() modifies the buffer in a crucial way, and
> > there's no WAL logging? Without even a comment arguing why that's OK (I
> > don't think it is)?
>
> Peter Geoghegan just reminded me over IM that there's actually logging
> inside log_heap_visible(), called from visibilitymap_set(). Still lacks
> a critical section though.
Hmm, isn't there already a critical section in visibilitymap_set itself?
> I still think this is the wrong architecture.
Hmm.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2019-04-05 03:07:29 | Re: COPY FREEZE and setting PD_ALL_VISIBLE/visibility map bits |
Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2019-04-05 02:59:25 | Re: [PATCH v20] GSSAPI encryption support |