| From: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Retronym: s/magnetic disk/main data/ |
| Date: | 2019-04-04 13:41:17 |
| Message-ID: | 20190404134117.GD1225@fetter.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 05:49:36PM +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I propose that in v13 we redefine "MD" (from md.c) to mean "main data"
> (instead of "magnetic disk"). That's the standard storage layout for
> typical table and index AMs. As opposed to the proposed undo and SLRU
> SMGRs that provide layouts specialised for different life cycles.
Maybe we could use dd for "diamagnetic data" ;)
Best,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Rowley | 2019-04-04 13:41:42 | Re: COPY FROM WHEN condition |
| Previous Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2019-04-04 13:40:40 | Re: pg_upgrade version checking questions |