Re: Extending USE_MODULE_DB to more test suite types

From: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Extending USE_MODULE_DB to more test suite types
Date: 2019-04-04 05:56:58
Message-ID: 20190404055658.GD1319573@rfd.leadboat.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 01:01:11PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 9:52 AM Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> wrote:
> > I plan to back-patch the PostgreSQL patch, to combat buildfarm noise. Perhaps
> > someone has test automation that sets USE_MODULE_DB and nonetheless probes the
> > exact database name "pl_regression", but I'm not too worried. The original
> > rationale for USE_MODULE_DB, in commit ad69bd0, was to facilitate pg_upgrade
> > testing. Folks using "make installcheck-world" to populate a cluster for
> > pg_upgrade testing will see additional test coverage, which may cause
> > additional failures. I'm fine with that, too.

Pushed. It looks like XversionUpgradeSave relies on having a
"contrib_regression" database:
https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_history.pl?nm=crake&br=REL9_5_STABLE

> Excellent. Extending use of USE_MODULE_DB has been on my list of
> things to do. I'll add the buildfarm patch right away. It should be
> harmless before these changes are made.

Thanks.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2019-04-04 06:06:41 Re: Caveats from reloption toast_tuple_target
Previous Message GUO Rui 2019-04-04 05:55:03 Re: Google Summer of Code: question about GiST API advancement project