Re: Concurrency bug with vacuum full (cluster) and toast

From: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Concurrency bug with vacuum full (cluster) and toast
Date: 2019-04-03 15:21:13
Message-ID: 20190403152113.GA12360@telsasoft.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 02:27:07PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 1:37 PM Alexander Korotkov
> <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
> > Thank you for pointing, but none of the threads you pointed describe
> > this exact problem. Now I see this bug have a set of cute siblings :)
>
> Yeah. I really thought this precise issue -- the interlocking between
> the VACUUM of the main table and the VACUUM of the TOAST table -- had
> been discussed somewhere before. But I couldn't find that discussion.

That also describes the longstanding issue with pg_statistic / pg_toast_2619,
no ?

I think that's maybe what Robert is remembering, and searching for
pg_toast_2619 gives a good number of results (including my own problem report).

Is this an "Opened Item" ?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2019-04-03 15:26:20 Re: Concurrency bug with vacuum full (cluster) and toast
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2019-04-03 14:43:33 Re: [PATCH v20] GSSAPI encryption support