Re: Feature: triggers on materialized views

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Mitar <mmitar(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Feature: triggers on materialized views
Date: 2019-04-01 07:06:10
Message-ID: 20190401070610.GC16093@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 03:41:08PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> Yeah. The fact that a concurrent refresh currently does DELETE+INSERT
> rather than UPDATE is currently an implementation detail. If you
> allow users to hook up triggers to the inserts, then suddenly it's no
> longer an implementation detail: it is a user-visible behavior that
> can't be changed in the future without breaking backward
> compatibility.

We are visibly going nowhere for this thread for v12, so I have marked
the proposal as returned with feedback.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jamison, Kirk 2019-04-01 07:40:10 RE: Timeout parameters
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2019-04-01 06:59:19 Re: pgsql: Compute XID horizon for page level index vacuum on primary.