| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: propagating replica identity to partitions |
| Date: | 2019-03-28 16:46:33 |
| Message-ID: | 20190328164633.GA22571@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Thanks, Michael and Peter, for responding; however there is a second
part to the question, which is "should I change the recursivity of
REPLICA IDENTITY, while not simultaneously changing the recusivity of
the TABLESPACE and OWNER TO forms of ALTER TABLE?"
I think everyone agrees that REPLICA IDENTITY should be changed. The
question is whether it's bad behavior from my part to change it
separately from changing every other non-currently-recursive form.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrey Borodin | 2019-03-28 17:08:29 | Re: amcheck verification for GiST |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2019-03-28 16:43:10 | Re: jsonpath |