Re: Shouldn't current_schema() be at least PARALLEL RESTRICTED?

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Shouldn't current_schema() be at least PARALLEL RESTRICTED?
Date: 2019-03-27 02:36:50
Message-ID: 20190327023650.GW2558@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 02:16:00PM +0000, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> The new status of this patch is: Ready for Committer

Thanks Daniel for the review, committed.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2019-03-27 02:40:12 Re: BUG #15672: PostgreSQL 11.1/11.2 crashed after dropping a partition table
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2019-03-27 02:36:12 Re: performance issue in remove_from_unowned_list()